In particular, I would like to focus on his criticism on the novel Black Rain by Masuji Ibuse, a work that, according to Treat, is moving due to its representation of typical characters that encounter an atypical catastrophe. As an American, he analyzes these works and how these authors represented the events of the bombings. Treat provides criticisms on several works by Japanese authors about the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War.
![where is the enola gay wasteland 2 where is the enola gay wasteland 2](https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/fMEOqZoxfh62R1brSl7RjsDtYS4=/400x0/cdn2.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4233215/Tibbets-wave.0.jpg)
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995. Writing Ground Zero: Japanese Literature and the Atomic Bomb. Sharp addresses the American standpoint on the Japanese at the time of WWII and the publication of Hersey’s “Hiroshima.” He says that the Americans at the time were essentially racist and hostile towards the Japanese and Hersey broke this popular view with his release of “Hiroshima.” “From Yellow Peril to Japanese Wasteland: John Hersey’s ‘Hiroshima’.” Twentieth Century Literature, 46.4 (2000): 434-52. He includes quotes from them and also dedicates a chapter on their perception of America. Lifton interviewed many survivors of the Hiroshima bombing and did a psychological study of them. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1991. The pictures are striking and I’d like to somehow incorporate one into my essay, or if not, into my final portfolio. This book is a compilation of drawings and artwork made by survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Unforgettable Fire: Pictures Drawn by Atomic Bomb Survivors. It is similar to John Hersey’s Hiroshima because it exposes the victims of the bombing without explicitly incorporating a political standpoint. This is a tragic novel about the aftermath of the bombing of Hiroshima. Tokyo and Palo Alto: Kodansha International Ltd., 1969. Several of them also mention the controversy over the censoring of the Enola Gay exhibit in the Smithsonian, which is something I would like to address in my essay. Many of the essays sympathize with the Japanese. Hein and Selden compile a set of essays addressing American and Japanese reactions to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. Living With the Bomb: American and Japanese Cultural Conflicts in the Nuclear Age. This is a good source for this essay because it talks about American standpoints in detail as well as what Boyer thinks of Hersey’s Hiroshima. Also Boyer mentions that Hersey is part of the minority of Americans who believed that the bomb was immoral. He includes statistics about how people felt about the atomic bomb in America and addresses all viewpoints held at the time. Chapel Hill: University of Chicago Press, 1994.īoyer addresses American opinions on the atomic bomb politically, scientifically, and morally. By the Bomb’s Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age. This essay will address what Hiroshima says about the Japanese to postwar America.īoyer, Paul S.
![where is the enola gay wasteland 2 where is the enola gay wasteland 2](https://images.indianexpress.com/2020/08/hiroshima-nagasaki.jpg)
I’d like my essay to compare and contrast the two but focus on how Americans, during and immediately after the bombing, tended to dehumanize the event, avoiding any mention of the victims and emphasizing the rationality of the atomic bomb. The purpose of the research I’m trying to do is to find Japanese and American reactions to the bombing of Hiroshima. The Human Victims Represented in John Hersey’s Hiroshima Sources are very important because they greatly influence your paper. The books and articles I found provided me with new ideas that caused me to abandon the topic I introduced in my prospectus. Gathering sources for my annotated bibliography significantly affected my paper because it greatly influenced my final paper's topic.